http://www.901am.com/2006/stumbleupon-launches-stumblevideo.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=stumbleupon-launches-stumblevideo New Media News Every Morning Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.901am.com/2006/stumbleupon-launches-stumblevideo.html/comment-page-1#comment-127 Thord Daniel Hedengren Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:27:36 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=304#comment-127 That most certainly is a problem. Then again, perhaps Youtube will start adding ads after the video, then every showing is a win-win situation. That would be a reasonable solution perhaps. That most certainly is a problem. Then again, perhaps Youtube will start adding ads after the video, then every showing is a win-win situation. That would be a reasonable solution perhaps.

]]> http://www.901am.com/2006/stumbleupon-launches-stumblevideo.html/comment-page-1#comment-126 muhammad saleem Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:28:09 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=304#comment-126 What the company is doing, is making all the content from these video sharing sites available to the users, but without actually driving traffic to these sites. So while YouTube (Google) is paying to host the content, StumbleVideo is streaming the content to users for free, and at no cost to themselves. So far this is okay because they are using the publicly available APIs from the sites, but what happens if Google decides that it doesn’t want to give StumbleVideo a free ride? What the company is doing, is making all the content from these video sharing sites available to the users, but without actually driving traffic to these sites. So while YouTube (Google) is paying to host the content, StumbleVideo is streaming the content to users for free, and at no cost to themselves. So far this is okay because they are using the publicly available APIs from the sites, but what happens if Google decides that it doesn’t want to give StumbleVideo a free ride?

]]>