Court rules against Target on website accessibility lawsuit
A federal district court judge issued two landmark decisions today in a nationwide class action against Target Corporation. First, the court certified the case as a class action on behalf of blind Internet users throughout the country under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). Second, the court held that web sites such as Target.com are required by California law to be accessible.
The ruling was issued in a case brought by the National Federation of the Blind (NFB). The suit charges that Target failed and refused to make Target.com accessible to the blind and, therefore, violated the ADA as well as two California civil rights statutes: the California Unruh Civil Rights Act and the California Disabled Persons Act.
The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a nationwide class under the ADA for injunctive relief. The court also granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a California subclass for both injunctive relief and statutory minimum damages. The court denied Target’s motion for summary judgment.
The court certified, as counsel for the class, the following law firms: Disability Rights Advocates; Brown, Goldstein & Levy; Schneider & Wallace; and Peter Blanck, chairman of the Burton Blatt Institute and university professor at Syracuse University.
Related posts:
- Belgian Court Says Nay to Google
- Bloggers get first federal court press credentials
- Court rejects webcasters’ motion to delay royalty rates
- The MPAA Lists The Top 25 Movie Piracy Schools
- Hollywood brings Cinemaweb.net and SSUpload.com to court for copyright infringement
Do you like this article? Submit it to Blogosphere News!
[...] 901am: Court rules against Target on website accessibility lawsuit [...]
By Is the Target Lawsuit Frivolous? - Accessites.org on October 7, 2007 10:56 pm
[...] Kalifornien ist nun ein privates Unternehmen verurteilt worden, weil seine Web site nicht den gesetzlichen Accessibility (oder auf Deutsch [...]
By Es wird ernst mit Accessibility on October 8, 2007 5:44 am
What crap this is. There are certain things you can’t DO because you’re blind, navigate teh entire internet is one of them. Newsflash everyone IS NOT EQUAL, SOME PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT ABILITIES!
Jesus, what’s next, suing Chevy for non-blind accessable cars?
By SingleMalt on October 10, 2007 9:52 am
[...] I care second because I have a legal obligation to develop web sites which comply with WCAG 1.0, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and the Anti Discrimination Act 1998. I am also aware there is a movement toward regulating accessibility (for example section 508 in the United States) and similar laws through Europe. Look at Bruce McGuire versus SOCOG in Australia and recently Target overseas. [...]
By » Blog Archive » I Don’t Care About Blind People - StevenClark.com.au on October 26, 2007 2:45 am
This is the reason designing with Web standards is so incredibly important. We’re not far away from a legal mandate that all company sites must be designed for accessibility. There are indeed great technologies available to make the Web available to those with different abilities and there is no better way to say that your brand cares than to design your sites with that in mind.
By Mark Neigh on October 30, 2007 11:19 am
[...] National Federation of the Blind (NFB) recently won their nationwide class action suit against Target for violating the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) which guarantees full and [...]
By Web Accessibility is Good Business (and May Soon be the Law) | Pot Luck on October 30, 2007 5:16 pm
Navigating the “entire internet” is possible with scriptreading software, one of which is called “Jaws.” Singlemalt might wanna lay off the liquor before inserting foot. Besides, the laws only give “equal access,” not exclusive or superior access. And even primates cannot get termites out of hills to eat with their bare appendages, they use “tools” like sticks and twigs to dig them out. SO sometimes individuals just need assistance which can take many different forms. But nobody likes a TOOL.
By melowepie on November 4, 2007 10:57 pm
I sense that the court has taken the appropriate steps in this direction.
By Atika on April 14, 2008 11:21 am
What?! When do I get to sue Target for having a website that downlaods slowly on a 56k connection?
I think this case is total BS
By Trid on April 30, 2008 12:38 pm
You can think it is total BS but the truth is the U.S. is way behind the rest of the world on this. Changing their (Target’s) site is NOT that difficult. Any good designer today understands accessibility. For those who think this is total BS I hope you never go blind and try navigate the web in the U.S.
By Action on May 9, 2008 8:57 pm
for those of you who think that this lawsuit is “BS” or “Crap” are very short sighted… there were people who fought against wheelchair accessiblity in public places as well… Civil Rights apply to everyone… not just the ones with 20/20 vision and show can run the 40 in less than 5 seconds. Plus, as a business person, one would think that there is a demographic out there that would be more than willing to shop at your 508 compliant web site, so they dont have to roll their blind arses down to the closest Target store. :)
By rascalpants on October 7, 2008 5:28 pm
Everyone’s views are not the same!
By cheap chi flat iron on September 1, 2009 11:51 pm
Thank you very much very nice article
Great information! Very useful for me. Thanks a lot.
By wholesale lingerie on October 13, 2009 5:14 am
How do you think they’re [VoIP providers] going to get to customers?
Through a broadband pipe. Cable companies have them. We have them. Now what
they would like to do is use my pipes free, but I ain’t going to let them do
that because we have spent this capital and we have to have a return on it.
So there’s going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these
pipes to pay for the portion they’re using. Why should they be allowed to
use my pipes?”
By 莆田seo on October 29, 2009 3:25 am