Death of the Paparazzi
According to a top paparazzo, amateur camera-phone photographers are putting the squeeze on celebrity photographers.
German Hans Paul, who says he once earned $120,000 for a picture of a then-pregnant Julia Roberts, said fees for paparazzi had been driven to new lows as even fans and autograph hunters now know how to market their pictures.
The advancements in camera-phone technology have made camera-phones cheap enough and the quality of the photographs good enough to be used widely and be useful at the same time. Furthermore, online outlets have made it incredibly easy for ordinary people to be linked with newspapers and other media to sell pictures to them directly. We covered one such outlet last December.
Mr Paul highlighted the example of the pictures of the execution of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein as evidence of how images captured on a mobile phone can create news in any media. He said: “There is no doubt that we paparazzi are suffering from this. There is hardly any money to be made in the everyday business.”
The Guardian has more. (Subscription required, required information is available here)
Related posts:
- Rumors of the death of newspapers are greatly exaggerated
- Verizon Plus iPhone Equals Death To Google’s Android?
- Motorola announces Droid Razr, The Thinnest Android Phone
- Rumors of the death of blogs are greatly exaggerated
- Whrrl v2.0 adds SMS and digital camera support
I might add that gossip bloggers such as Perez Hilton (who is being sued by six different paparazzi agencies as we speak) who steal photos and news from EVERYONE, without sourcing, are also driving these prices down.
Actually Perez is the only blogger I know of who has the balls to do this – he’s stolen stuff from pretty much every gossip site on the Web without sourcing once.
By W on March 2, 2007 7:28 am
Why should they be worried?
They are getting theirs and so is the ringleader Pereze.
By Gloria on March 5, 2007 12:33 am