Comments on: Fixing Wikipedia’s “Liberal Bias” http://www.901am.com/2007/fixing-wikipedias-liberal-bias.html New Media News Every Morning Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:13:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Stephan Tual http://www.901am.com/2007/fixing-wikipedias-liberal-bias.html/comment-page-1#comment-2128 Stephan Tual Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:07:20 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1179#comment-2128 Wikipedia is great for articles that cannot be controversial by nature. The article about rivers for example (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River) is just great! My daughter used it for her homework, and it saved me money by not having to buy Encarta. The downside is that the rest is hopelessly biased one way or another by whichever pressure group has more manpower to throw at it. I'm not surprised some people are feeling left out. Wikipedia is great for articles that cannot be controversial by nature. The article about rivers for example (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River) is just great! My daughter used it for her homework, and it saved me money by not having to buy Encarta.

The downside is that the rest is hopelessly biased one way or another by whichever pressure group has more manpower to throw at it. I’m not surprised some people are feeling left out.

]]> By: Vince Williams http://www.901am.com/2007/fixing-wikipedias-liberal-bias.html/comment-page-1#comment-2129 Vince Williams Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:03 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1179#comment-2129 I can just imagine what Conservapedia's take on evolution of the species will be. I suppose some modern-day Fred Flintstone will write the article. I can just imagine what Conservapedia’s take on evolution of the species will be.

I suppose some modern-day Fred Flintstone will write the article.

]]>