<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gravatar is coming back this February</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:40:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris P.</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html/comment-page-1#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=601#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Before it flopped, Gravatar was a &lt;em&gt;hugely&lt;/em&gt; popular service, and in my opinion, it&#039;s one of those MySpace-esque elements that people &lt;strong&gt;just like&lt;/strong&gt;.

Personally, I&#039;m quick to ridicule them and say &quot;don&#039;t use their service!&quot; But, the bottom line is that if they&#039;re the only ones serving bio images to sites across the Web, then they&#039;re going to be running a very popular service.

But, I still maintain that a true professional is going to do whatever he or she can to avoid having elements, be they &lt;acronym title=&quot;JavaScript&quot;&gt;JS&lt;/acronym&gt; or otherwise, served externally to their site.

And what if you have like 100 different commenters on a post? How long is &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; gonna take to load?

Fuhgetaboutit.

&lt;strong&gt;Hart&lt;/strong&gt; — Seems like it would be easier to have people claiming false identities that way. Not that it&#039;s a big issue, necessarily, but it&#039;s easier to use someone&#039;s email address than it is to use their computer :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before it flopped, Gravatar was a <em>hugely</em> popular service, and in my opinion, it&#8217;s one of those MySpace-esque elements that people <strong>just like</strong>.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m quick to ridicule them and say &#8220;don&#8217;t use their service!&#8221; But, the bottom line is that if they&#8217;re the only ones serving bio images to sites across the Web, then they&#8217;re going to be running a very popular service.</p>
<p>But, I still maintain that a true professional is going to do whatever he or she can to avoid having elements, be they <acronym title="JavaScript">JS</acronym> or otherwise, served externally to their site.</p>
<p>And what if you have like 100 different commenters on a post? How long is <em>that</em> gonna take to load?</p>
<p>Fuhgetaboutit.</p>
<p><strong>Hart</strong> — Seems like it would be easier to have people claiming false identities that way. Not that it&#8217;s a big issue, necessarily, but it&#8217;s easier to use someone&#8217;s email address than it is to use their computer :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html/comment-page-1#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=601#comment-676</guid>
		<description>I personally like to see my caricature/avatar everywhere on other people&#039;s sites. Then again, it sucked before when it wasn&#039;t working and all you get are big &quot;X&quot;es or delays in loading the pages. 

I did a spyware clean up this morning, and it seemed that all that is being deleted are recognizeable cookies now. I&#039;d much prefer a gravatar based on my email address in your comments - then a script reading a cookie on my computer and figuring out mybloglog account and avatar over there. *shrugs*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like to see my caricature/avatar everywhere on other people&#8217;s sites. Then again, it sucked before when it wasn&#8217;t working and all you get are big &#8220;X&#8221;es or delays in loading the pages. </p>
<p>I did a spyware clean up this morning, and it seemed that all that is being deleted are recognizeable cookies now. I&#8217;d much prefer a gravatar based on my email address in your comments &#8211; then a script reading a cookie on my computer and figuring out mybloglog account and avatar over there. *shrugs*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html/comment-page-1#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=601#comment-675</guid>
		<description>I guess you give something up for interaction purposes. Call me old fashioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you give something up for interaction purposes. Call me old fashioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Daniel Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html/comment-page-1#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=601#comment-674</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s my opinion as well, although the success of MyBlogLog shows that people tend to think differently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my opinion as well, although the success of MyBlogLog shows that people tend to think differently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/gravatar-is-coming-back-this-february.html/comment-page-1#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=601#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Heck no I&#039;m not using it. Just like I dont use mybloglog. I like to host all my data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck no I&#8217;m not using it. Just like I dont use mybloglog. I like to host all my data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
