<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mtvU greenlights &#8220;Cause Effect&#8221; with Windows Live Messenger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/mtvu-greenlights-cause-effect-with-windows-live-messenger.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/mtvu-greenlights-cause-effect-with-windows-live-messenger.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mtvu-greenlights-cause-effect-with-windows-live-messenger</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/mtvu-greenlights-cause-effect-with-windows-live-messenger.html/comment-page-1#comment-10830</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.901am.com/2007/mtvu-greenlights-cause-effect-with-windows-live-messenger.html#comment-10830</guid>
		<description>Umm, this all sounds wonderful, but why isn&#039;t globalwarmingheartland.org listed as one of the organizations?  Why should global warming be listed as a problem when that hasn&#039;t been shown yet?  Same old idiots pushing the same old tired agenda, with no scientific basis for it.  Why aren&#039;t the views of the very top atmospheric scientists even allowed to be included? (you know, like the guy who founded the weather channel, or the guy who headed the National Weather Service for 30 years, or the top atmospheric scientist at MIT, or the head of NASA, or the top atmospheric scientist at the University of Virginia??   . .  ALL of these men have come out and said global warming is a fraud (and/or [in the unlikely event it is real] it is nothing to be feared and we don&#039;t need to do anything about it.  WHY is it always the mental midgets, the simpletons that we have to listen to with their alarmist nonsense, and the intelligent side never is allowed to be heard??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, this all sounds wonderful, but why isn&#8217;t globalwarmingheartland.org listed as one of the organizations?  Why should global warming be listed as a problem when that hasn&#8217;t been shown yet?  Same old idiots pushing the same old tired agenda, with no scientific basis for it.  Why aren&#8217;t the views of the very top atmospheric scientists even allowed to be included? (you know, like the guy who founded the weather channel, or the guy who headed the National Weather Service for 30 years, or the top atmospheric scientist at MIT, or the head of NASA, or the top atmospheric scientist at the University of Virginia??   . .  ALL of these men have come out and said global warming is a fraud (and/or [in the unlikely event it is real] it is nothing to be feared and we don&#8217;t need to do anything about it.  WHY is it always the mental midgets, the simpletons that we have to listen to with their alarmist nonsense, and the intelligent side never is allowed to be heard??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

