<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace delivers eCPM of 0.29 cents in 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/myspace-delivers-ecpm-of-029-cents-in-2006.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/myspace-delivers-ecpm-of-029-cents-in-2006.html</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/myspace-delivers-ecpm-of-029-cents-in-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 06:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1453#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>bugger, I knew I&#039;d stuff those sums up...although having said that it&#039;s uniques per month as opposed to outright page views, so we&#039;d go even lower still!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bugger, I knew I&#8217;d stuff those sums up&#8230;although having said that it&#8217;s uniques per month as opposed to outright page views, so we&#8217;d go even lower still!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/myspace-delivers-ecpm-of-029-cents-in-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 06:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1453#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>&gt;In eCPM terms, with 31.5 billion page views for the year

The bizweek article was reporting &quot;...an average of 31.5 billion unique page views per month...&quot;

Thus.. 378 billion pages in 2006.. thus, even lower eCPM in that case?.. rgds, /ac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;In eCPM terms, with 31.5 billion page views for the year</p>
<p>The bizweek article was reporting &#8220;&#8230;an average of 31.5 billion unique page views per month&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus.. 378 billion pages in 2006.. thus, even lower eCPM in that case?.. rgds, /ac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
