Comments on: Should Wikipedia Have Advertising? http://www.901am.com/2007/should-wikipedia-have-advertising.html New Media News Every Morning Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:46:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Helge Olav Helgesen http://www.901am.com/2007/should-wikipedia-have-advertising.html/comment-page-1#comment-340 Helge Olav Helgesen Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:34:11 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=485#comment-340 Advertising is an income - which I understand they need. I can't see any way ads can compromise Wikipedia’s neutrality. But if they go for ads I'd prefer a system like AdSense. I like Google ads for two reasons: 1. The ads are matched to the content - ie. I can probably use the ads. 2. Google ads are short and concise. Advertising is an income – which I understand they need. I can’t see any way ads can compromise Wikipedia’s neutrality.

But if they go for ads I’d prefer a system like AdSense.

I like Google ads for two reasons:
1. The ads are matched to the content – ie. I can probably use the ads.
2. Google ads are short and concise.

]]>