<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:44:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: billg</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>billg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Depicting Gawker Media as a poor little independent publisher is more than a bit disingenuous. Whatever kind of &quot;professional arrangement&quot; they had with Sony, Sony was within its rights to sever that relationship if Kotaku violated it. Imagining that Sony will now suffer a PR disaster grossly overinflates the impact of a few blogs on the public&#039;s  awareness.

And, Duncan:  Publishing rumors i precisely the kind of thing a responsibile news outlet does not do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depicting Gawker Media as a poor little independent publisher is more than a bit disingenuous. Whatever kind of &#8220;professional arrangement&#8221; they had with Sony, Sony was within its rights to sever that relationship if Kotaku violated it. Imagining that Sony will now suffer a PR disaster grossly overinflates the impact of a few blogs on the public&#8217;s  awareness.</p>
<p>And, Duncan:  Publishing rumors i precisely the kind of thing a responsibile news outlet does not do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helge Olav Helgesen</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>Helge Olav Helgesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>Sony can do this because they are a big company. What they did here will not ruin anything for them.

When that is said - I agree with Thord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony can do this because they are a big company. What they did here will not ruin anything for them.</p>
<p>When that is said &#8211; I agree with Thord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PS3 Cabinet &#187; Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>PS3 Cabinet &#187; Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>[...] Brian Crecente writes at Kotaku that the blacklisting followed his attempts to gain comment from Sony on the rumors of a new service alleged to be called â&#8364;&#339;PlayStation Homeâ&#8364; that includes similar features to that already offered by &#8230;  901am - http://www.901am.com    By Duncan Riley  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brian Crecente writes at Kotaku that the blacklisting followed his attempts to gain comment from Sony on the rumors of a new service alleged to be called â&#8364;&#339;PlayStation Homeâ&#8364; that includes similar features to that already offered by &#8230;  901am &#8211; <a href="http://www.901am.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.901am.com</a>    By Duncan Riley  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Thord, I fully agree with you. It&#039;s journalist&#039;s right to report whatever he/she wants but taking responsibility of the consequences is a part of it too.

Is it my right as a company owner to stop cooperation with other party? Yes it is. And I don&#039;t even need a reason for that.

Kotaku looks like a little child who hit his uncle and now cries because uncle doesn&#039;t want to take him on a trip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thord, I fully agree with you. It&#8217;s journalist&#8217;s right to report whatever he/she wants but taking responsibility of the consequences is a part of it too.</p>
<p>Is it my right as a company owner to stop cooperation with other party? Yes it is. And I don&#8217;t even need a reason for that.</p>
<p>Kotaku looks like a little child who hit his uncle and now cries because uncle doesn&#8217;t want to take him on a trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Daniel Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://kotaku.com/gaming/sony/sony-and-kotaku-makeup-240922.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;They made up.&lt;/a&gt; I doubt they would have if it had been a smaller blog than Kotaku...

Adam, it&#039;s not a journalist&#039;s responsibility to protect your company. Journalist should report news, no matter if a company likes it or not. Are rumors news? Sometimes, not always. In this case? Depends on the source I&#039;d say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kotaku.com/gaming/sony/sony-and-kotaku-makeup-240922.php" rel="nofollow">They made up.</a> I doubt they would have if it had been a smaller blog than Kotaku&#8230;</p>
<p>Adam, it&#8217;s not a journalist&#8217;s responsibility to protect your company. Journalist should report news, no matter if a company likes it or not. Are rumors news? Sometimes, not always. In this case? Depends on the source I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Arrogant? I ask you nicely not to publish an information and you publish it anyway. You know that you will harm my company but you go for it despite I asked you not to. Do you think I still want to cooperate with you? Get real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrogant? I ask you nicely not to publish an information and you publish it anyway. You know that you will harm my company but you go for it despite I asked you not to. Do you think I still want to cooperate with you? Get real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Playstation 3 &#187; Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Playstation 3 &#187; Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 06:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Duncan Riley and software by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Duncan Riley and software by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony and Kotaku Quibble over PlayStation Home Rumor - CyberNet News</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony and Kotaku Quibble over PlayStation Home Rumor - CyberNet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: 901AM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: 901AM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Playstation 2 &#187; Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/sony-blacklists-kotaku-for-publishing-playstation-rumors.html/comment-page-1#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Playstation 2 &#187; Sony blacklists Kotaku for publishing PlayStation rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1130#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Duncan Riley and powered by Img Fly    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Duncan Riley and powered by Img Fly    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
