Statsaholic defense hits a spanner: owner a convicted extortionist
The defense of the well regarded Statsaholic (previously Alexaholic), currently on the receiving end of law suit from Amazon for the crime of daring to use Amazon’s open API’s and render Alexa data better than Amazon was, has just hit the mother of all spanners, according to TechCrunch, Statsaholic’s owner, Ron Hornbaker, is a convicted extortionist.
But wait, it gets better, because as well as serving jail time for extortion, Hornbaker wasn’t just your garden variety, every day extortionist, he was an internet extortionist as well, frequenting AOL Chat rooms trying to extort money from wayward husbands. Yep, he’s 1996’s version of Michael Crook.
Knowing this, a lot of people have got egg on their faces, including yours truly, for going in to bat for a chap who well…just doesn’t play cricket, if you know what I mean. Time to remove my name from the online petition against the legal action as well, and apologize to Amazon. Sorry Amazon, I’ll do some digging before acting against you in the future.
Related posts:
- Insincerity thy name is Michael Crook
- FreshBooks selects Amazon PFS
- Wallstrip Owner Threatened With Legal Action by Video Blogger
- Lazy Husbands Learn How to Be Romantic
- President quotes bloggers in Iraq defense
Do you like this article? Submit it to Blogosphere News!
Duncan, I tend to believe the past is past, it should not have anything to do with the current case. Who’s driving a smear campaign now is another question, and I have my doubts…
By Zoli Erdos on April 22, 2007 11:48 pm
[...] a natural thing that people will believe those who haven’t convicted yet. That’s what Duncan did and he’s now asking sorry to Amazon for participating the online petition against Amazon. [...]
By To Whom Should We Believe, Amazon or Statsoholic? » SELaplana on April 23, 2007 1:54 am
Duncan, you are committing the same mistake once again. This time by bashing Ron Hornbaker without digging into or trying to comprehend Amazon’s PR smear campaign.
They have dugged the past to make it look as if they guy is blackmailing them just like he did in the past. Something that may or may not be true. It could really be Amazon doing the blackmailing this time.
By Bilal Hameed on April 23, 2007 8:52 am