<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows more secure than Mac OSX: official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/windows-more-secure-than-mac-osx-official.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/windows-more-secure-than-mac-osx-official.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=windows-more-secure-than-mac-osx-official</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacoby Thwaites</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/windows-more-secure-than-mac-osx-official.html/comment-page-1#comment-2412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacoby Thwaites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1337#comment-2412</guid>
		<description>If I were Symantec, complete with a vague idea of where my market is, I&#039;d push Windows over Mac even harder than this ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were Symantec, complete with a vague idea of where my market is, I&#8217;d push Windows over Mac even harder than this ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Seery Gude</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/windows-more-secure-than-mac-osx-official.html/comment-page-1#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Seery Gude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1337#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>You make some excellent points and I&#039;m glad that you&#039;re pointing out to Mac users that OS/X has plenty of security problems (they need to hear this for their own good). However, &lt;em&gt;your post&#039;s lack of emphasis&lt;/em&gt; in the area of &lt;strong&gt;severe&lt;/strong&gt; security vulnerabilities is problematic. 

Security people will point out that the first priority is to avoid and then fix the high security threats - the ones that will cause great harm to their users. I&#039;m glad to see Microsoft is doing better than Apple in the area of overall number of bugs &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; that they&#039;re responding to those problems more quickly than Apple or other competitors. Great! But Apple had 1 severe problem to Microsoft&#039;s 12... &lt;strong&gt;And for this you declare Microsoft a winner?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some excellent points and I&#8217;m glad that you&#8217;re pointing out to Mac users that OS/X has plenty of security problems (they need to hear this for their own good). However, <em>your post&#8217;s lack of emphasis</em> in the area of <strong>severe</strong> security vulnerabilities is problematic. </p>
<p>Security people will point out that the first priority is to avoid and then fix the high security threats &#8211; the ones that will cause great harm to their users. I&#8217;m glad to see Microsoft is doing better than Apple in the area of overall number of bugs <em>and</em> that they&#8217;re responding to those problems more quickly than Apple or other competitors. Great! But Apple had 1 severe problem to Microsoft&#8217;s 12&#8230; <strong>And for this you declare Microsoft a winner?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncus</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/windows-more-secure-than-mac-osx-official.html/comment-page-1#comment-2414</link>
		<dc:creator>ncus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1337#comment-2414</guid>
		<description>Right! And now i a want to use OutLook again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right! And now i a want to use OutLook again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

