<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired redesign verdict: Looking good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good.html/comment-page-1#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1283#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>Nice! I agree that it looks old fashioned but I love that. It is Wired, it has got tech heritage and its visuals should reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I agree that it looks old fashioned but I love that. It is Wired, it has got tech heritage and its visuals should reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good.html/comment-page-1#comment-2271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1283#comment-2271</guid>
		<description>Blocky and big is in. Time&#039;s redesign did the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blocky and big is in. Time&#8217;s redesign did the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Daniel Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good.html/comment-page-1#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1283#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>Well, blocky is what Wired does best. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, blocky is what Wired does best. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wired-redesign-verdict-looking-good.html/comment-page-1#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1283#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. It looks very old fashioned to me, like 1950&#039;s hobby magazines. Having said that, The Times (London) has gone the same route -- all blocky straps and big features. Hmmm. Let&#039;s hope it&#039;s a passing phase. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. It looks very old fashioned to me, like 1950&#8242;s hobby magazines. Having said that, The Times (London) has gone the same route &#8212; all blocky straps and big features. Hmmm. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s a passing phase. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

