<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress.com Snaps to it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wordpresscom-snaps-to-it</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snap me if you can&#8230; &#171; That&#8217;s all, folks!</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Snap me if you can&#8230; &#171; That&#8217;s all, folks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=584#comment-653</guid>
		<description>[...] Jan 16, 2007 in Blogging   When I went through my usual feeds today, I saw that David Krug posted something about Wordpress&#8217; latest &#8220;snappy&#8221; idea. This just reinforced my overall skepticism of anything Web two-dot-ohey. Even more so since they&#8217;ve decided, &#8220;after the overwhelming response to [their] last entry about Snap&#8221;, to enforce it upon every blogger using their system as a default for all links. Completely overwhelmed myself, I was able to disable it, though. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jan 16, 2007 in Blogging   When I went through my usual feeds today, I saw that David Krug posted something about WordPress&#8217; latest &#8220;snappy&#8221; idea. This just reinforced my overall skepticism of anything Web two-dot-ohey. Even more so since they&#8217;ve decided, &#8220;after the overwhelming response to [their] last entry about Snap&#8221;, to enforce it upon every blogger using their system as a default for all links. Completely overwhelmed myself, I was able to disable it, though. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kazana</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>kazana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=584#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Oh, Snap. 

Thanks for the warning, I just turned it off. Web 2.0, thou art a puny hell-hated boar-pig!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Snap. </p>
<p>Thanks for the warning, I just turned it off. Web 2.0, thou art a puny hell-hated boar-pig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=584#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Maybe so Ashley, but on the whole it&#039;s bloody annoying, particularly at TechCrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe so Ashley, but on the whole it&#8217;s bloody annoying, particularly at TechCrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Cecil</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=584#comment-650</guid>
		<description>95% of the time I would agree, although, for a small handful the thumbnails are brilliant.  For visually rich blogs linking to other sites with content that is carried by their design, it&#039;s a great feature.  Of course this is coming from an artist/blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>95% of the time I would agree, although, for a small handful the thumbnails are brilliant.  For visually rich blogs linking to other sites with content that is carried by their design, it&#8217;s a great feature.  Of course this is coming from an artist/blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=584#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Yup, It appears to be clutter to me. Although I guess some folks really dig em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, It appears to be clutter to me. Although I guess some folks really dig em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaro</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2007/wordpresscom-snaps-to-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=584#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I never understood the whole snap thing. What information value do they give to the visitors? 

Same with del.icio.us. What&#039;s the purpose of the little thumbnails next to the most popular links? More clutter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood the whole snap thing. What information value do they give to the visitors? </p>
<p>Same with del.icio.us. What&#8217;s the purpose of the little thumbnails next to the most popular links? More clutter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

