http://www.901am.com/2007/youtubes-lifeline-dmca-section-512.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=youtubes-lifeline-dmca-section-512 New Media News Every Morning Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.901am.com/2007/youtubes-lifeline-dmca-section-512.html/comment-page-1#comment-2238 Darren Cronian Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:54:13 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1255#comment-2238 I wonder if Google regret the acquisition of You Tube. All and sundry will be filing copyright infringement notices because they know that Google are 'big money' I wonder if Google regret the acquisition of You Tube. All and sundry will be filing copyright infringement notices because they know that Google are ‘big money’

]]> http://www.901am.com/2007/youtubes-lifeline-dmca-section-512.html/comment-page-1#comment-2239 Chip Griffin Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:24:57 +0000 http://www.actionwebtools.com/~nine01am/?p=1255#comment-2239 The problem, I would think, is that the exception requires (as you point out) an "automatic technological process, without any selection of that material by the provider." As I understand it, YouTube gives other providers the ability to filter infringing content, which would suggest "selection" on the part of the company. At a minimum, it makes the argument less than frivolous, and I would imagine a judge would rule it a question of fact and not of law. The problem, I would think, is that the exception requires (as you point out) an “automatic technological process, without any selection of that material by the provider.” As I understand it, YouTube gives other providers the ability to filter infringing content, which would suggest “selection” on the part of the company. At a minimum, it makes the argument less than frivolous, and I would imagine a judge would rule it a question of fact and not of law.

]]>