<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Goes on a Diet, Experiments with YouTube Feather</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.901am.com/2009/youtube-goes-on-a-diet-experiments-with-youtube-feather.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.901am.com/2009/youtube-goes-on-a-diet-experiments-with-youtube-feather.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=youtube-goes-on-a-diet-experiments-with-youtube-feather</link>
	<description>New Media News Every Morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2009/youtube-goes-on-a-diet-experiments-with-youtube-feather.html/comment-page-1#comment-28038</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.901am.com/?p=12194#comment-28038</guid>
		<description>YouTube on a diet?  The way the site has been going, it&#039;s positively anorexic.  Stripped of bulletins, downgraded to beta, not even listing the number of videos watched anymore and, now, out with the comments and ratings?!  Talk about going downhill.  As far as I&#039;m concerned, the premise of faster loading videos is just a front for further reducing user interaction, given what Feather removes from the video viewing experience.  YouTube is not know for benevolence towards the masses and this venture shouldn&#039;t be taken at face value.  It&#039;s not what it claims to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube on a diet?  The way the site has been going, it&#8217;s positively anorexic.  Stripped of bulletins, downgraded to beta, not even listing the number of videos watched anymore and, now, out with the comments and ratings?!  Talk about going downhill.  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, the premise of faster loading videos is just a front for further reducing user interaction, given what Feather removes from the video viewing experience.  YouTube is not know for benevolence towards the masses and this venture shouldn&#8217;t be taken at face value.  It&#8217;s not what it claims to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold Zafra</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2009/youtube-goes-on-a-diet-experiments-with-youtube-feather.html/comment-page-1#comment-27960</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Zafra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.901am.com/?p=12194#comment-27960</guid>
		<description>Thanks Franky. Hopefully the lesser features will result to faster load time. But based on my initial observation, it didn&#039;t improve a bit on my side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Franky. Hopefully the lesser features will result to faster load time. But based on my initial observation, it didn&#8217;t improve a bit on my side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky Branckaute</title>
		<link>http://www.901am.com/2009/youtube-goes-on-a-diet-experiments-with-youtube-feather.html/comment-page-1#comment-27959</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky Branckaute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.901am.com/?p=12194#comment-27959</guid>
		<description>Only last 10 comments, no comment form. Less options when grabbing the embed code (less .js to load for all the customisation options). Looks a lot more like Vimeo, the best video site, now. Just uglier. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only last 10 comments, no comment form. Less options when grabbing the embed code (less .js to load for all the customisation options). Looks a lot more like Vimeo, the best video site, now. Just uglier. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

